|
cannotbebothered100 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
And you would in a libertarian society and especially in a full anarcho-capitalist, Lockean society, be induced to buy particular insurance as mandate for selecting property in those areas where if the market can bear such divestment of residential capital from serving ends that would imply not making that list of contracts (which the market would of course allow as alternative) that people will select such areas purchase rules to avoid negative externality from environs.
cannotbebothered100 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
are induced to be suboptimally located where more risk is imposed and people are discouraged from lowering risks to lower voluntary market price signals the State silenced.
cannotbebothered100 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
When people criticise libertarianism for not allowing the State to compel people to pay for what otherwise wouldn't be underwritten, know that any location of actions where they will strain services such as fire insurance and garbage collection, when subsidised to prevent the in effect risk-of-strain streaming by cost and insurance premium price signals,
Visfen (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Brilliant.
ximortalpwnr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Great video, I learned a lot.
mmac382 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yes the US placed an embargo on Iraq oil but do you really think the prevented China France and England from getting Iraq oil? And at gun point? I think you are confused on the term embargo. I just today saw Ron Paul say we need to befreind Iran and countries like Egypt because it will cause them to stop building nukes. Yes he specificaly said make friends. A little niaeve dont you think?
newperve (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@mmac382 Wow, you don't get a reference to the Iraq oil embaro and so you call me a liar Just because you don't know about it dosn't mean it is not true. But thanks for lifting the tone of the debate with claims of dishonest and calling me chickenshit. You are even ignorant of the subjects you bring up, the US didn't "tolerate" Mubarack they supported him. And you haven't shown that this support protected minorities, in fact US actions probably led to a lot of the persecution of christians.
mmac382 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@newperve No examples indicates you are not being honest with your statements. I never said the US is responsible to protect foriegn minorities. My point was a side effect of tolerating a "Dictatorial piece of shit" was the safety of the christians. The elimination of the dictator obviously exspose the piece of shit Islamic populous of Egypt. Libertarians are just chicken shit liberals in conservative like clothing.
newperve (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@mmac382 Well then you didn't attention from Auguat 6, 1990 to May 2003. Given you didn't pay attention for over a decade why are you talking the region? Protecting the minorities of other countries is NOT the job of the US. If Mubarack hadn't been a dictatorial piece of shit the Islamist might not have got the strength they did and might not be persecuting minorities. A good libertarian government would want only the absence of a bad relationship, not a good one.
mmac382 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I dont recall the US pointing guns a anyone and forceing them not to sell oil. You'll have to update me. Mubarak although piece of crap, protected the minorities and christians. They are now being brutalized. A good Libertarian would want a good relationship with anyone at least on a business basis. |
